HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E7
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141211
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateApr 06 '20 at 03:58
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 176
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 342
44% 332 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 4.23
Parallax 4.62
4% 4.51 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 5.91
4% 5.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 105 102 88 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 61.8
Write 90.3
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 97.7
52% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
59% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$32
73GB free
Firmware: H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 67 62 70 67 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 74.3
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 66.9
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 42%
Samsung HD160JJ/ 160GB
39GB free
Firmware: 0-38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 45.3
Mixed 31
SusWrite 40.9
28% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.5% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback