Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3P-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics46% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H270-HD3P
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-HD3P-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 02:41
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 88%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$25
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 51.2
1-Core 83
2-Core 105
48% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 143
18% 135 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46% Average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 55.8
Parallax 84.3
43% 64.2 fps
MRender 71.2
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 56.1
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 215GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 355 301 304 306 304 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 482
Write 378
Mixed 396
SusWrite 303
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 10
66% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 215
166% 228 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 21.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 19.7
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-HD3P-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $264
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback