Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit farver, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110307
Uptime27.8 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '17 at 14:34
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
65.2% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 167
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 243
39% 279 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Gigabyte(1458 351A) 1GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.88% Terrible
Lighting 11
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 9.25
9% 11.1 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 15.3
12% 14.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.88%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04TH Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 425
Write 257
Mixed 324
74% 336 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 5.03
60% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.7
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 5.16
16% 32.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
208GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 77.6
Mixed 97.5
69% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.28
85% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
6GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 54.7
Mixed 52.2
41% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.22
81% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 23
Write 6.73
Mixed 9.78
14% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.21
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.89
96% 2.49 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-084.A01LF 9905403-084.A01LF 9905471-006.A01LF 9905403-084.A01LF 10GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.3% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $224
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback