Asrock H61M-IDE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-IDE  (all builds)
Memory8.1 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '17 at 18:30
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 91
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 347
47% 352 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.12.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 67.1
Parallax 79.3
53% 70.4 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 55.7
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 120GB
46GB free
Firmware: P0901A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.8% Good
Read 268
Write 240
Mixed 250
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 31.5
96% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 79.5
88% 147 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 64%
OCZ AGILITY4 64GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.1.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 196
Write 160
Mixed 178
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 19.1
75% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 50.6
68% 124 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 61%
Toshiba MQ01ABF032 320GB-$37
248GB free
Firmware: AM001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 89.3
Write 90.6
Mixed 85.7
67% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.22
75% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
164GB free
Firmware: AM0Q5E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 75.7
Write 72.5
Mixed 80
58% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.17
66% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1A1333C9 10GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-IDE Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-IDE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback