Asrock H61M-IDE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-IDE  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131113
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 11 '18 at 17:37
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 182
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 437
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2020 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.12.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 86
58% 75.7 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 69.3
Splatting 57.2
53% 65.6 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 120GB
32GB free
Firmware: P0901A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.1% Good
Read 266
Write 241
Mixed 251
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 30.6
87% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 80.2
87% 145 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 64%
OCZ AGILITY4 64GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.1.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 187
Write 91.9
Mixed 118
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 14.4
60% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 80.1
DQ Mixed 44.3
54% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 61%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
102GB free
Firmware: AM0Q5E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 79.7
Write 71.8
Mixed 71.8
56% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.15
58% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 60%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 320GB
69GB free
Firmware: AM001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.8% Average
Read 70.6
Write 78.5
Mixed 66.1
54% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.34
4K Write 1.43
4K Mixed 0.19
62% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-IDE Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-IDE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback