Packard EasyNote TK85

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote TK85 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EasyNote TK85
Memory	1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110314
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 07 '17 at 14:01
Run Duration	233 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 480 16,023 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 62.7 1-Core 69.5 2-Core 121 50% 84.4 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 168 22% 168 Pts	64-Core 168 10% 168 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6300M 2,918 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 0487) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	1.33% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 2.23 Parallax 1.88 1% 1.89 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 0.93 Splatting 2.17 1% 1.72 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.33% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 335 Series 240GB-$219 4,220 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: 335u Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 18 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -100253126618282 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1488 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 374 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 312332 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 312332 (F2) Unknown 100 100 420435 (F9) Unknown 100 100 8221	43.8% Average	Read 248 Write 200 Mixed 214 49% 221 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 27.5 4K Mixed 13.1 54% 18.4 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 66.2 65% 104 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 103GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 157 152 3150 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9088 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7370 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2451 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 562 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 217 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 132 132 204133 (C2) HDA temperature 114 95 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	29% Poor	Read 39.4 Write 61.6 Mixed 51 38% 50.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.31 77% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 43%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB 8,748 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 28GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.42% Terrible	Read 28.4 Write 6.51 Mixed 21.6 21% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.85 4K Write 1.04 4K Mixed 0.72 71% 1.54 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 9.42% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GB 8,194 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.6% Poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.3 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.9 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 120 33% 120 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote TK85 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TK85

CPU
Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples	23x
Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples	21x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	19x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	73x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	27x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	2x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	11x
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	9x
ACR256X64D3S1333C9 2x2GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,134 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $168

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16