Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160406
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '20 at 07:27
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	PAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 144 64% 103 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 436 42% 346 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XFX(1682 9470) CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.8.1 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	37.9% Below average	Lighting 43.2 Reflection 62.8 Parallax 66.1 35% 57.4 fps	MRender 63 Gravity 45.1 Splatting 51.1 43% 53.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 218 42 43 43 44 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 417 Write 315 Mixed 278 SusWrite 117 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 31.5 108% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 118 95% 134 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 23GB free Firmware: AX001C SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 58 58 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 56.1 Write 55.2 Mixed 26.2 SusWrite 57.4 36% 48.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 57%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB 6,367 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 16GB free Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 47 47 47 47 48 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 44.8 Write 34.5 Mixed 32.9 SusWrite 46.8 29% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 1,926 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 23 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 18.5 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 14.3 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FX-GAMING Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FX-GAMING

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	122x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	33x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	32x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	17x
R9 380AMD $200Bench 33%, 83,027 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	11x
GP-ASM2NE2256GTTDR 256GBGigabyteBench 158%, 4,456 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	24x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 1,520 samples	8x
F3 DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 45%, 445 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $303

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16