MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '17 at 15:51
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 133
62% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 469
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
PwrHis(1787 2014) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 7.33
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 9.06
6% 8.72 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 11
8% 9.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ph4-ce24 0 240GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F/W: Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 455
Write 425
Mixed 466
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 10.8
110% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 16.5
73% 162 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3300831AS 300GB
64GB free
Firmware: 3.06 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 63
Mixed 60.4
47% 62 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.31
75% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-002.A00LF Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Corsair CMV4GX3M1B1600C11 16GB
800, 667, 667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.8% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback