Asus X99-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory20 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150930
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 20:38
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 714
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 884
55% 884 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 128
Parallax 145
106% 134 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 127
Splatting 106
110% 139 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 298
Write 124
Mixed 196
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 40.2
153% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 127
122% 197 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
26GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 501
Write 483
Mixed 431
105% 472 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 57.5
199% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 234
210% 317 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
537GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 448 442 468 469 469 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 466
Mixed 448
SusWrite 457
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 90.2
4K Mixed 56.7
166% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Lacie Portable SSD 500GB
89GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 154 75 75 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 388
Write 155
Mixed 208
SusWrite 119
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 6.2
41% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 96%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 161 161 163 164 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 162
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 162
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 112%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
651GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 151 154 153 151 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 160
Write 146
Mixed 87.8
SusWrite 152
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 112%
Staples 4GB
4GB free, PID 5573
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 18
Write 13
Mixed 14.5
SusWrite 4.8
16% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
94% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2133 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 2176 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 39.9
117% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 21.6
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 106%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,987 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback