Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '20 at 20:15
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 169
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 524
50% 415 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 38.6
30% 39.1 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 39.4
Splatting 34.3
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 256GB-$300
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 154 151 139 138 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.6% Above average
Read 254
Write 220
Mixed 238
SusWrite 143
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 31
109% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88.2
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 176
128% 162 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 89%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 391 393 397 398 399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 468
Write 392
Mixed 402
SusWrite 395
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 27.8
117% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 50
76% 143 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 94 95 95 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 92.2
Write 92.9
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 94.5
68% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G KHX1866C10D3/4G AE34G1609U2 AE34G1609U2 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.7% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback