Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V GENE (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130819
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '20 at 13:16
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	67%

Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 74.9 1-Core 86.6 2-Core 159 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 455 43% 356 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143 318,562 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Gigabyte(1458 3FBE) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	62.2% Good	Lighting 84.1 Reflection 49.5 Parallax 72.3 68% 68.6 fps	MRender 91.1 Gravity 75 Splatting 30.8 50% 65.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 391GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 183 210 205 191 186 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.7% Above average	Read 186 Write 179 Mixed 163 SusWrite 188 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 27.1 82% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 221GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 94.1 Write 73.1 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 122 56% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB 984 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 11.8 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 90.5 44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	331x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	187x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	60x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	29x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	22x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,364

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16