Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 23 '17 at 04:08
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 61.9
2-Core 124
53% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 284
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Asus(1043 0443) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 8.43
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 7.09
7% 7.88 fps
MRender 7.33
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 6.48
6% 6.74 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.4%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier SP550 240GB-$74
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0121AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 346
Write 172
Mixed 173
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 16.4
64% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 43.8
48% 81.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 92%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
70GB free
Firmware: SAFM00.U Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 360
Write 318
Mixed 307
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 13.7
72% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 22.4
47% 97 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 111%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
1.5TB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
45% Average
Read 100
Write 115
Mixed 79.1
126% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.33
72% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45%
Great: 54%
Samsung Flash Drive 64GB
14GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 130
Write 69.2
Mixed 28.2
81% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.94
92% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C10D3/4G Corsair CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 Corsair CMX8GX3M2B1600C9 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback