PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Intel MAHOBAY (all builds) |
Memory | 7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
Display | 4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170726 |
Uptime | 2.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 22 '21 at 12:04 |
Run Duration | 241 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STRSD013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 183 214 219 218 220 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
Vaseky V800/240GB 240GB
42GB free
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 182 65 43 10 6.4 MB/s
|
29.9%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
166GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 96 95 96 97 MB/s
|
55.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
|||
TOSHIBA USB 3.5"-HDD 1.5TB
135GB free, PID 0b09
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2620 4TB
454GB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
4.1%
Terrible
|
|||
FSPEED 3.0ATA2000GB 2TB
2TB free, PID 04d2
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 0.1 9.9 6.4 2.3 MB/s
|
5.93%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
49.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 108x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 75x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 73x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 78x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 57x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |