Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7310 APU (2015 M.Ca) 12,494 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	37.9% Below average	Memory 54.2 1-Core 35.4 2-Core 71.2 34% 53.6 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 128 17% 127 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 19,746 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 82F6) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.17% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 3.7 2% 3.17 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 4.1 3% 3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.17% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Biostar S100-256GB 256GB 336 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 131 140 140 142 143 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 332 Write 286 Mixed 283 SusWrite 155 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 21.1 91% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 36.3 60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-052.A00G 2x8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 5.8 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,497x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,740x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,182x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	400x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	378x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	343x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16