Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics71% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateJul 05 '17 at 18:12
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 77
1-Core 59.1
2-Core 111
52% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 300
32% 258 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2054 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71% Very good
Lighting 84.1
Reflection 95.4
Parallax 85.8
69% 88.4 fps
MRender 90.5
Gravity 92.5
Splatting 93.7
76% 92.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 71%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 480
Write 318
Mixed 334
84% 377 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 20.1
92% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 45.8
50% 85.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 118%
OCZ Trion 150 120GB-$50
28GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 327
Write 314
Mixed 326
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 8.54
51% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 93.3
DQ Mixed 39.7
50% 90.3 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 89%
OCZ Trion 150 120GB-$50
19GB free
Firmware: SAFZ12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 486
Write 311
Mixed 333
83% 377 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 9.54
56% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 85.1
DQ Mixed 44.8
50% 86.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback