Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory120.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '21 at 13:55
Run Duration358 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 188
65% 119 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 614
51% 444 Pts
64-Core 3,710
230% 3,710 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.97
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 149
Parallax 154
119% 150 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 150
Splatting 127
109% 134 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
861GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 476 481 484 487 479 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 85% Great: 132%
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320
614GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1386 1460 1462 1451 1432 1441 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,834
Write 1,918
Mixed 1,279
SusWrite 1,439
364% 1,618 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 65.1
200% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 442
DQ Write 494
DQ Mixed 188
219% 375 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 245%
Great: 425%
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
373GB free
Firmware: R022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 430 280 266 279 285 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
Seagate ST4000NM0025 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: N003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 202 205 204 203 203 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 106
Write 156
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 202
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
121% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
854GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 157 157 157 155 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 77.9
Write 70.5
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 154
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 114%
Hitachi UltraStar 7K4000 2TB
393GB free
Firmware: MF6OAA70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 109 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 43.1
Write 113
Mixed 54.4
SusWrite 108
59% 79.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.3
88% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M386A8K40BMB-CRC 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.1% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 13.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 1R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 38% 13 108 5 60 32" 1920 1080 MTC0B01 MTC26T42
Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 284 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $623
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback