Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G1840-$69 7,524 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 41.8 1-Core 55.4 2-Core 95.2 37% 64.1 Pts	4-Core 79.7 8-Core 111 12% 95.5 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.88% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 5.7 Parallax 4.8 4% 5.03 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 5 4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.88% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 240GB 240GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 190 193 193 256 206 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Read 381 Write 334 Mixed 296 SusWrite 210 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 29.9 96% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 98.2 103% 173 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99P5474-014.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 9 32% 11.3 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	144x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	75x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	64x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	18x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	14x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $237

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16