Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Memory 23.1 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 45.3 17% 28.8 Pts	4-Core 70.6 8-Core 81.4 10% 76 Pts	64-Core 84.2 5% 84.2 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 8305) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 2.8 2% 2.8 fps	MRender 2.3 Gravity 2.7 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
BHT WR202HH032G E70215F5 31GB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: 150100 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 148 Write 21.5 Mixed 39.5 15% 69.5 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 7.3 26% 6.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 21%
Ut165 USB Flash Disk 2GB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	4.19% Terrible	Read 17 Write 2.5 Mixed 2.2 SusWrite 3.6 6% 6.33 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 15% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.19% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Empty S939A2SGS-ITR 1x8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	14.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.1 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 5.8 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 299 13% 299 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 14%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,496x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,738x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,180x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	399x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	378x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	342x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16