Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 23 '17 at 21:32
Run Duration	733 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B60 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 56% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 89.9 1-Core 48.6 2-Core 96.6 52% 78.4 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 188 21% 166 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3643) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Lighting 31.9 Reflection 29 Parallax 37.2 26% 32.7 fps	MRender 40.6 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 33.3 30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3625 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1586 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 98 98 78 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (B5) Unknown 100 100 8482586101294 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 115 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 98 98 2 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	50.9% Above average	Read 378 Write 185 Mixed 200 56% 255 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 4.56 79% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 28.1 DQ Write 93.5 DQ Mixed 4.93 20% 42.2 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 72%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 23GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1385 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 625 (B1) Unknown 99 99 8 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 61 32 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2072514870	107% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 388 Mixed 409 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 94.1 4K Mixed 42.6 172% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 199 DQ Mixed 96.6 109% 188 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 115%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 168 4183 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 118 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 248 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 116 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 115 (C2) HDA temperature 121 115 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	92.9% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 146 Mixed 141 116% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 2.71 4K Mixed 0.3 119% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 86%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB 16,094 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 913GB free Firmware: SC23 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 102971440 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2487 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 25316527 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3671 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1580 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 3 3 97 (BE) vendor-specific 74 65 437649434 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 38 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2500 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 73014444058 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.7% Very good	Read 145 Write 123 Mixed 100 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.13 4K Mixed 0.15 56% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 100%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.4% Very poor	Read 19.8 Write 18.2 Mixed 10.5 20% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.22 59% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 69%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 19 Mixed 11.5 21% 16.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.24 67% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 57%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 892GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 18.1 Mixed 9.71 19% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.25 67% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 69%
Kingston DT 100 G2 16GB 1,132 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 5GB free, PID 1653 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Read 21.3 Write 8.98 Mixed 9.88 15% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.007 1% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 8%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 630 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	5.83% Terrible	Read 26 Write 4.46 Mixed 5.9 11% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.82 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.04 18% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 10%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.34% Terrible	Read 21.1 Write 17.8 Mixed 14.2 22% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.27 4K Write 0.76 4K Mixed 0.24 35% 0.42 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.34% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 16GB 293 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 12.7 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.6 22% 7.8 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	4x
F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16