PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z420 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1589 |
Memory | 11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190613 |
Uptime | 1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 24 '22 at 08:20 |
Run Duration | 198 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2637 v2
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
63.7%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
KingFast 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 134 57 83 76 27 MB/s
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
754GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 155 162 170 169 170 MB/s
|
87.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
194GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 109 111 112 112 MB/s
|
81.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.4 6.3 5.9 6.4 6.3 MB/s
|
4.83%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9965434-038.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
|
40.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,501x |
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 780x |
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples | 689x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 496x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 307x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 261x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |