Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200901
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '22 at 23:08
Run Duration	328 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 123 2-Core 245 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 806 76% 633 Pts	64-Core 1277 79% 1277 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.1% Poor	Lighting 32.5 Reflection 35.2 Parallax 33.2 26% 33.6 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 34.1 Splatting 23.8 25% 32.1 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 17,877 User benchmarks, average bench 247% 358GB free (System drive) Firmware: 711250WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2160 2320 2116 172 167 162 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 1,132 Write 2,482 Mixed 1,906 SusWrite 1,183 382% 1,676 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 73.3 253% 94.6 MB/s	DQ Read 950 DQ Write 737 DQ Mixed 797 609% 828 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 333%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 81GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 287 258 237 219 206 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 454 Write 386 Mixed 352 SusWrite 261 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 48.8 170% 59 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 329 254% 347 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 201GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 142 146 144 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	74.3% Very good	Read 115 Write 106 Mixed 71 SusWrite 144 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 221% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 108%
External USB3.0 500GB 1,761 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 141GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 70 69 70 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Read 51.2 Write 52.7 Mixed 32 SusWrite 69.2 38% 51.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 63%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 250GB 809 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 187GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 32 26 20 2.3 0.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 128 Write 52.6 Mixed 64.6 SusWrite 21.1 77% 66.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.4 160% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 32%
ST332082 0AS 320GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 81GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 19.9 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 4.7 28% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 19%
ST332062 0AS 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 79GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 36 37 36 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Read 38.8 Write 39.8 Mixed 32.3 SusWrite 36.4 50% 36.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB 35,395 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 44.8 MC Write 39.4 MC Mixed 35.2 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 28.8 SC Write 40.8 SC Mixed 32.3 97% 34 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II Builds (Compare 1,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	262x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD $119Bench 86%, 14,368 samples	202x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $151Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	180x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	148x
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	52x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	44x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	39x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	64x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	56x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $390

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B450M-PLUS II

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)