Packard EASYNOTE ML65

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemPackard EASYNOTE ML65  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard PB5M
Memory0.7 GB free of 2.00195 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '22 at 07:43
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T6400-$130
Micro-FCPGA, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 25
2-Core 61.4
35% 50.7 Pts
4-Core 60.1
8-Core 58.6
8% 59.3 Pts
64-Core 58.6
4% 58.6 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3430
Device(1631 E218) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 189 187 44 180 151 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.5% Average
Read 242
Write 228
Mixed 220
SusWrite 157
48% 212 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 15
65% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 26.5
41% 77.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$78
66GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 35 35 43 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 44
Write 44.8
Mixed 33
SusWrite 39.7
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36GB
null MHz
2048, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.9
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EASYNOTE ML65 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EASYNOTE ML65

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback