Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 34 User benchmarks, average bench 54% None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	61.2% Good	Memory 68 1-Core 77.9 2-Core 150 57% 98.6 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 501 48% 397 Pts	64-Core 587 36% 587 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 537GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 408GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 24 32 31 50 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 328 Write 201 Mixed 236 SusWrite 36.2 44% 200 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 1.9 23% 6.93 MB/s	DQ Read 420 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 364 263% 344 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 85%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 54GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 348 Write 142 Mixed 282 195% 258 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 3.9 1,025% 7.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% null MHz 3968, 12416 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	MC Read 45 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 40 112% 39 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 13.9 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,049x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	826x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	427x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16