Asrock X58 Extreme6

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X58 Extreme6 (all builds)
Memory	21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111031
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '22 at 16:28
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	76.1% Very good	Memory 97 1-Core 63.8 2-Core 161 65% 107 Pts	4-Core 306 8-Core 400 45% 353 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7600 GT 1,212 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 81F7) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 309.08 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.81% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 2 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.81% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ts64gssd 370S 64GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: P122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 21 17 18 19 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 351 Write 82.9 Mixed 45 SusWrite 26.7 27% 126 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 19 4K Mixed 15.9 66% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 38.3 DQ Write 72.6 DQ Mixed 18.6 25% 43.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 68%
Maxtor 6V320F0 320GB 601 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 262GB free Firmware: 1900 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 58 58 58 58 59 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 62.1 Write 71.6 Mixed 42.6 SusWrite 48.6 41% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.2 133% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 38%
SanDisk Cruzer Spark 16GB 1,145 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 14GB free, PID 55a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 9.6 10 11 10 10 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 19.3 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 11 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 2.5 198% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63% Good	MC Read 24 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 23.9 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 50.4 79% 50.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme6

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	5x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	4x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	4x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
840 250GBSamsung $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	14x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	5x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $550

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16