Supermicro X9DA7/E

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9DA7/E (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DA7/E
Memory	52.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140702
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '22 at 08:07
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 1,402 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 71.1 1-Core 51.5 2-Core 126 50% 82.8 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 426 41% 336 Pts	64-Core 902 56% 902 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Asus(1043 86E8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.84 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.9% Above average	Lighting 88.2 Reflection 120 Parallax 74.4 72% 94.4 fps	MRender 61.1 Gravity 79.1 Splatting 0.2 34% 46.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 15 18 50 113 53 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 202 Write 173 Mixed 176 SusWrite 59.6 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 15.2 67% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 63.3 DQ Mixed 19.6 22% 35.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 100%
Crucial MTFDDAK256MBF-1AN15ABHA 256GB 1,835 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 65GB free Firmware: M6T3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 127 125 125 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 262 Write 296 Mixed 243 SusWrite 124 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 30.1 98% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 78 DQ Mixed 39 34% 48.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 104%
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB 11,652 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 189GB free Firmware: 04TH SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 17 20 54 114 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 294 Write 232 Mixed 222 SusWrite 61.6 45% 203 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 13.2 64% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 70.3 DQ Mixed 15.4 20% 35.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 69%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$73 8,846 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 127 125 125 122 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 162 Write 165 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 124 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 113%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB 9,937 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 977GB free Firmware: 5G11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 102 102 101 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 84.7 Write 86.5 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 100 65% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 61%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB 1,657 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 361GB free, PID 3008 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 28 Write 24.2 Mixed 22 SusWrite 24.7 33% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0- 4x16GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.4% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 10.3 32% 11.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.8 20% 6.9 GB/s	Latency 98.9 40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DA7/E Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DA7/E

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples	5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	4x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 01stBench 61%, 1,139 samples	3x

GPU
NVS 510NvidiaBench 3%, 2,450 samples	3x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	2x

SSD
530 Series 240GBIntel $149Bench 76%, 16,872 samples	2x
850 Pro 128GBSamsung $70Bench 99%, 18,195 samples	2x
830 128GBSamsung $109Bench 63%, 37,250 samples	1x

RAM
9965516-165.A 8x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 3 samples	3x
M393B1G70QH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 183 samples	2x
18JSF1G72PDZ- 4x8GBMicronBench 86%, 7 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 7% - Terrible

Total price: $149

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16