Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 67.6 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 163 57% 100 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 640 58% 488 Pts	64-Core 1,596 99% 1,596 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Duo 197 User benchmarks, average bench 39% AMD(1002 0336) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1243 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 17.12 Performing below potential (60^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.6% Below average	Lighting 43.7 Reflection 51.5 Parallax 64.1 36% 53.1 fps	MRender 63.1 Gravity 46.8 Splatting 53.4 44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 42%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK2T0TBN 2TB 5,114 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: M0MU031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 442 354 272 278 277 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 394 Write 458 Mixed 362 SusWrite 344 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 30.6 104% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 294 224% 298 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2K70CM0- 4x16GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	MC Read 52.5 MC Write 44.4 MC Mixed 43.3 134% 46.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 4.2 SC Mixed 5.4 19% 6.63 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	56x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	46x
M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 96%, 634 samples	25x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16