Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Memory 38.5 1-Core 25.5 2-Core 50.9 24% 38.3 Pts	4-Core 98.8 8-Core 100 13% 99.5 Pts	64-Core 99.6 6% 99.6 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 82F6) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	1.63% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 2.7 1% 2.67 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.4 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.63% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000H1 128GB 4,948 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT21H3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 89 92 104 104 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 389 Write 342 Mixed 276 SusWrite 107 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 39.1 4K Mixed 28.7 93% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 127 93% 122 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Empty CT51264BF160BJ.C8F Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 6.1 15% 5.4 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 209 19% 209 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 4,472 samples	40x
Radeon R4AMDBench 2%, 19,746 samples	26x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	6x

SSD
MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 91%, 5,596 samples	7x
SD8SNAT-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 2,836 samples	3x
MZNLF128HCHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 46%, 3,641 samples	2x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 1x4GBMicronBench 19%, 3,980 samples	11x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	8x
AM1L16BC8R2-B1XS 1x8GBAdataBench 22%, 2,239 samples	5x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16