| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C09 |
| Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200609 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 14 '22 at 14:15 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.1%
Good
|
69% 122 Pts
|
39% 296 Pts
|
20% 325 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 1C81) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25%
Poor
|
26% 30.1 fps
|
23% 29.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3700100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 65 53 53 42 72 MB/s
|
50.6%
Above average
|
45% 206 MB/s
|
68% 29.7 MB/s
|
84% 178 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G KF2666C16D4/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
51.2%
Above average
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
42% 14.8 GB/s
|
42% 94.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,376 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,324x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,510x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 294x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 636x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 464x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $296Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 360x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $355 |