Performance Results


Gaming 152% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 137% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	148% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B10
Motherboard	MSI MEG Z390 GODLIKE (MS-7B10) (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20211116
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '22 at 00:14
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 96.4 1-Core 146 2-Core 292 98% 178 Pts	4-Core 581 8-Core 949 94% 765 Pts	64-Core 1,008 62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$499 218,061 User benchmarks, average bench 158% MSI(1462 5053) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 517.48 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	148% Outstanding	Lighting 224 Reflection 258 Parallax 200 183% 228 fps	MRender 224 Gravity 130 Splatting 90.7 114% 148 fps
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 148% Great: 170%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 856GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 1274 1474 1294 1164 1165 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	264% Outstanding	Read 1,788 Write 1,761 Mixed 1,304 SusWrite 1,212 341% 1,516 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 66.3 228% 81.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,218 DQ Write 922 DQ Mixed 1,049 790% 1,063 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 264% Great: 372%
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 80GB free Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 129 128 129 129 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 403 Write 127 Mixed 157 SusWrite 128 45% 204 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 20.9 101% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 124 121% 198 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion 240GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 179GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 306 329 332 335 339 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 364 Write 354 Mixed 325 SusWrite 314 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 30.9 4K Mixed 17 63% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 47.5 70% 130 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GB 520 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 31.4 106% 37 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 41.1 SC Mixed 29.2 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 52.6 76% 52.6 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 128%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	92x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	80x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	48x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	30x
CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 18,655 samples	27x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	23x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,652

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16