Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 82.1 2-Core 140 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 370 40% 320 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6400 4,292 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Asus(1043 05DD) ≥ 4GB Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.2.1 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Lighting 44.7 Reflection 63.1 Parallax 85.2 36% 64.3 fps	MRender 97.5 Gravity 46.3 Splatting 27.3 43% 57 fps
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intenso Sata III 240GB 2,859 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0511A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 162 134 147 136 132 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 458 Write 354 Mixed 385 SusWrite 143 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 21 90% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 42.8 82% 156 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 102%
Samsung MZHPU256HCGL-000H1 256GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 94GB free Firmware: UXM62H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 251 251 267 263 259 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Read 316 Write 252 Mixed 256 SusWrite 254 60% 269 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 20.6 79% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 205 178% 266 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 86%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 466GB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 162 161 162 161 160 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 444 Write 155 Mixed 216 SusWrite 159 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 4.1 40% 9.47 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5173QH0-YK0 Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G9K1 Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G9K1 Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G9K1 Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G9K1 Hynix HMT451U7AFR8C-PB 16GB 1600, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.2% Good	MC Read 25.1 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 22.2 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	496x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	305x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	261x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	184x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	112x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 618 samples	65x
M391B5273DH0-CK0 8x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 244 samples	56x
9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 4x4GBMicronBench 78%, 366 samples	55x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16