Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 3556U 1,741 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Memory 60.5 1-Core 43 2-Core 64.8 37% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 65 8-Core 67.5 9% 66.2 Pts	64-Core 66.8 4% 66.8 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 810M 96 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 0869) 1GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	2.3% Terrible	Lighting 2.5 Reflection 3.4 Parallax 0.5 2% 2.13 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 2.8 Splatting 4 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.3% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
VK0480GEPQP 480GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 261 324 293 321 396 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 332 Write 334 Mixed 206 SusWrite 313 67% 296 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 29.2 4K Mixed 20.3 68% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 98 DQ Mixed 108 81% 108 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 2,529 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	35.5% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 13.5 36% 12.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.4 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	54	60	15.6"	1280 720	LGD030A

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium 3556UIntelBench 44%, 1,741 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	4x
GeForce 810MNvidiaBench 2%, 96 samples	2x

RAM
ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 24%, 6,155 samples	3x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	1x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,529 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16