Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 07:36
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 175
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 667
62% 514 Pts
64-Core 990
61% 990 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
MSI(1462 3870) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 55.6
52% 60.1 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 48.4
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 50%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zns256g NVMe KIOXIA 256GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10410105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 632 621 450 411 410 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,015
Write 541
Mixed 903
SusWrite 490
165% 737 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 48
155% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 475
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 423
291% 366 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 134%
Great: 219%
FCCT960M500SSD1 960GB
599GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 318 328 356 359 359 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 388
Write 374
Mixed 298
SusWrite 320
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 28.8
102% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 180
172% 269 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FAD 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 23.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 20.3
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 0P 5R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 16% 49 212 57 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM08FC SAMSUNG
Typical GA-X99-SOC Force-CF Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $368
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback