Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 28 '18 at 00:12
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 65.6 2-Core 126 59% 93.9 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 351 34% 282 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35.4% Below average	Lighting 46.4 Reflection 39.7 Parallax 38.8 38% 41.6 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 39.9 Splatting 35.2 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 112 51880665 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 -54683523594475 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4666 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 678 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 24 73 55839359000 (C2) HDA temperature 24 73 55839359000 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 51880665 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 51880665 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 51880665 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 92 92 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 42244 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14496 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14496 (F2) Unknown 0 0 25083	62.1% Good	Read 487 Write 146 Mixed 206 61% 279 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 58.2 4K Mixed 16.3 93% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 40 58% 109 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$116 12,285 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 117GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 70 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 100 98 (03) Spinup time 113 100 25791693133 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2562 (05) Reallocated sector count 31 31 54592373 (07) Seek error rate 100 94 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 100 30 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 17334 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2149 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 32 32 4521983 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 1769472 (BC) Unknown 100 83 6621973 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 38 337313819 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2605 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2605 (C2) HDA temperature 222 96 266288824347 (C4) Reallocation count 64 64 836 (C5) Current pending sector count 70 58 709 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 70 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	65% Good	Read 109 Write 118 Mixed 113 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.3 82% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 20.3 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 15 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.3 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 12.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16