Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150709
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 04 '18 at 20:48
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 575
61% 488 Pts
64-Core 585
36% 585 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 098A) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 30.9
20% 27.2 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 24.2
23% 28.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 mSATA 256GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM13D1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 476
Write 237
Mixed 311
75% 341 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 51.1
4K Mixed 22.8
88% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 78.7
DQ Mixed 58.9
73% 136 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
620GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 127
Write 108
Mixed 118
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.22
4K Mixed 0.24
75% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 114%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 256GB
105GB free, PID fa05
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 113
Write 9.48
Mixed 9.91
35% 44.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.11
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.44
38% 2.19 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1311 NT8GC64B8HB0NF-DI 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1311 NT8GC64B8HB0NF-DI 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 16.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback