AdataASP900S3-128GM-C
KingstonSH103S3/240G

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281. NAND Flash: Intel Micron Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2012.

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281VB1-SDC. NAND Memory: Intel Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 30,315 user samples
2,820 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 80% 50GB free
Worst Bench: 57% 13GB free (System drive)
Poor: 57% Great: 80%
SPEED RANK: 689th / 1072
27,495 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% 1TB free
Worst Bench: 59% 25GB free (System drive)
Poor: 59% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 477th / 1072
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
68.6 % 80.6 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
380 MB/s +1% 375 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
146 MB/s 243 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+66%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
27.5 MB/s 31.2 MB/s Faster random read.
+13%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
81.6 MB/s 82.3 MB/s +1%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
190 MB/s 274 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+44%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
33.6 MB/s 40.2 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+20%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
121 MB/s 183 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+51%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
428 MB/s 442 MB/s +3%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
168 MB/s 281 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+67%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
32 MB/s 37.8 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+18%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
116 MB/s +4% 112 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
216 MB/s 312 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+44%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
41.1 MB/s 49.6 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+21%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
148 MB/s 221 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+49%
Market Share
Based on 75,912,485 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.12 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,100%
Value
Value For Money
10.7 % 13.2 % Better value.
+24%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 53 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$40 Much cheaper.
+43%
$70
Age
Newest
146 Months 145 Months +1%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
199 MB/s 298 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue read.
+50%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
166 MB/s 264 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue write.
+59%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
712 Pts 985 Pts Much stronger server IO.
+38%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
171 MB/s 289 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+69%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
160 MB/s 258 MB/s Much faster deep queue read.
+61%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
143 MB/s 209 MB/s Much faster deep queue write.
+46%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
125 MB/s 223 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+78%
Capacity
Capacity
128GB 240GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The 128GB Adata Premier Pro SP900 has peak and average sequential read/write speeds of 496/166 and 175/106 MB/s. The average speeds are significantly worse than peak which indicates that the SP900 has an unstable performance profile. Additionally, the peak write speed of 166 MB/s is 90% below the group leaders. In terms of small file 4K read/write speeds things are a little better where the SP900 achieved peak and average scores of 23/83 and 17/29 MB/s. These 4K figures still lag the group leaders by around 40%. The Overall effective speed for the SP900 measures 340 MB/s, the worst I have seen to date on a 128GB SSD. The SP900 is not particularly well priced, and therefore represents poor value for money. There are both faster and cheaper 128GB alternatives available amongst the group leaders[Feb '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The HyperX 3K is an updated version of the regular HyperX, the only difference between the two SSDs is the grade of NAND flash. The regular HyperX's NAND flash is rated at 5,000 erase cycles vs 3,000 on the 3K version so broadly speaking the number of erase cycles before drive failure on the newer drive is approximately 40% less than on the original HyperX. The distinction is largely irrelevant for consumer users because even after 10 years neither of the drives are likely to come even close to their maximum number of erase cycles. As expected both HyperX's have very similar performance profiles which can be seen in this direct comparison of the two drives. Although the HyperX SSDs were strong contenders on release they are showing their age now and can no longer compete amongst the newer drives from Samsung and Plextor which are both cheaper and faster. [Jan '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) May 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback