Today's hottest deals
KingstonSH103S3/240G
KingstonSH100S3/240G

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281VB1-SDC. NAND Memory: Intel Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2012.

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281VB1-SDC. NAND Memory: Intel Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q3 2011.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 27,997 user samples
27,495 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% 1TB free
Worst Bench: 59% 25GB free (System drive)
Poor: 59% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 485th / 1080
502 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 92% 213GB free
Worst Bench: 60% 24GB free (System drive)
Poor: 60% Great: 92%
SPEED RANK: 534th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
80.6 % +4% 77.7 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
375 MB/s +1% 371 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
243 MB/s 253 MB/s +4%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
31.2 MB/s Slightly faster random read.
+7%
29.2 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
82.3 MB/s +5% 78.4 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
274 MB/s +3% 267 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
40.2 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+13%
35.5 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
183 MB/s 193 MB/s Slightly faster sustained write speed.
+5%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
442 MB/s +3% 428 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
281 MB/s 288 MB/s +2%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
37.8 MB/s Slightly faster peak random read.
+6%
35.5 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
112 MB/s 115 MB/s +3%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
312 MB/s Slightly faster peak mixed IO speed.
+6%
295 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
49.6 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+12%
44.2 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
221 MB/s 224 MB/s +1%
Market Share
Based on 77,590,954 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
0 %
Value
Value For Money
13.2 % 13.5 % +2%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 53 %
Price
Price (score)
$70 $65 Slightly cheaper.
+7%
Age
Newest
151 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
160 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
298 MB/s 306 MB/s +3%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
264 MB/s +2% 260 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
985 Pts 991 Pts +1%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
289 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+16%
249 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
258 MB/s 270 MB/s +5%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
209 MB/s 216 MB/s +3%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
223 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue mixed IO.
+10%
203 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 240GB

The HyperX 3K is an updated version of the regular HyperX, the only difference between the two SSDs is the grade of NAND flash. The regular HyperX's NAND flash is rated at 5,000 erase cycles vs 3,000 on the 3K version so broadly speaking the number of erase cycles before drive failure on the newer drive is approximately 40% less than on the original HyperX. The distinction is largely irrelevant for consumer users because even after 10 years neither of the drives are likely to come even close to their maximum number of erase cycles. As expected both HyperX's have very similar performance profiles which can be seen in this direct comparison of the two drives. Although the HyperX SSDs were strong contenders on release they are showing their age now and can no longer compete amongst the newer drives from Samsung and Plextor which are both cheaper and faster. [Jan '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The Kingston HyperX is nearly two years old which in SSD terms is almost an entire lifetime. Starting on a positive note this drive will outperform any mechanical drive hands down, and still has one of the highest sequential read speeds (517 MB/s) we have ever seen on a SATA SSD. That said a balanced performance profile is critical and the HyperX doesn't fare so well against its younger SSD competitors in the other write orientated benchmark categories. The poor results are explained by the Kingston's Sandforce controller which struggles to deliver incompressible data throughput. With a real world speed of 398.1 MB/s and an AS-SSD score of 728 (bottom 28th percentile) there are far better deals to be had at this time. [Apr '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback