Today's hottest deals
CrucialCT256M4SSD2
$218
CrucialCT240M500SSD1
 $218 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9174-BLD2. Flash Memory: Micron Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2011.

Controller: Marvell 88SS9187. Flash Memory: Micron Synchronous 20nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 49,717 user samples
17,938 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 74% 168GB free
Worst Bench: 43% 72GB free (System drive)
Poor: 43% Great: 74%
SPEED RANK: 804th / 1080
31,779 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% 121GB free
Worst Bench: 57% 90GB free (System drive)
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 551st / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
60.8 % 76.6 % Faster effective speed.
+26%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
432 MB/s +5% 413 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
240 MB/s 256 MB/s Slightly faster write speed.
+7%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
19.9 MB/s 22.9 MB/s Faster random read.
+15%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
74.1 MB/s 81.1 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
+9%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
250 MB/s 291 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+16%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
14.6 MB/s 31.9 MB/s Hugely faster random mixed IO.
+118%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
195 MB/s +1% 194 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
494 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+12%
442 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
268 MB/s 276 MB/s +3%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
23.4 MB/s 26.5 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+13%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
106 MB/s 116 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
+9%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
273 MB/s 310 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+14%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
18.9 MB/s 38.4 MB/s Hugely faster peak random mixed IO.
+103%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
265 MB/s 272 MB/s +3%
Market Share
Based on 77,534,764 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.03 % 0.06 % Hugely higher market share.
+100%
Value
Value For Money
4.46 % 12.2 % Hugely better value.
+173%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 54 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$218 $73 Much cheaper.
+67%
Age
Newest
163 Months 140 Months More recent.
+14%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
184 MB/s 328 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue read.
+78%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
234 MB/s 264 MB/s Faster peak deep queue write.
+13%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
752 Pts 1,011 Pts Much stronger server IO.
+34%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
33.1 MB/s 188 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+468%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
133 MB/s 296 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue read.
+123%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
136 MB/s 238 MB/s Much faster deep queue write.
+75%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
23.7 MB/s 166 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue mixed IO.
+600%
Capacity
Capacity
256GB 240GB

The Crucial M4 is one of the oldest SSD's to have made it into the group test. When it was released its primary competitors were Sandforce based drives which suffered from two major problems: reliability and weak incompressible data performance. As a result this drive was one of the top drives of its time. That was back in Apr '11. Today the M4 is no longer able to compete and scores below average (377.9 MB/s) on the Real World Speed Index benchmark and way below average (676) on the deep queue depth orientated AS-SSD Total score benchmark. Of course these figures are still far faster than any mechanical hard drive and owners of this drive should feel in no hurry to upgrade. People looking to make a new purchase will find much better value elsewhere. [Apr '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

We had high expectations for the Crucial M500. Crucial have a long history of producing outstanding Solid State drives. Both the RealSSD 300 and the M4, three and two years old, were almost legendary in terms of reliability and performance. The M500 falls far short of our expectations. The drive is relatively cheap and as such we were expecting to compromise on performance but the M500 just falls too far short. With a Real World Performance of 377.5 MBps which is in the bottom 40% and an AS-SSD score of 901 points (50th percentile) the M500 demonstrates relatively weak real world and average server performance. The M500 is competing with the Sandisk Ultra which manages to squeeze out significantly more performance despite sitting in the same price bracket. [Jun '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback