CrucialCT250MX200SSD1
$134
CrucialCT256MX100SSD1
$116
 $134 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2015.

 $116 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 25,882 user samples
7,534 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% 233GB free
Worst Bench: 63% 149GB free (System drive)
Poor: 63% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 170th / 959
18,348 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 98% 161GB free (System drive)
Worst Bench: 58% 175GB free (System drive)
Poor: 58% Great: 98%
SPEED RANK: 298th / 959
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
94.4 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+15%
82.1 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
429 MB/s +5% 410 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
413 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+30%
317 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
27.9 MB/s +5% 26.6 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
89.6 MB/s 92.8 MB/s +4%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
340 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+20%
284 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
39.5 MB/s Slightly faster random mixed IO.
+5%
37.5 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
337 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+53%
220 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
471 MB/s +4% 455 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
468 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+41%
332 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
33.2 MB/s Slightly faster peak random read.
+7%
31.1 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
123 MB/s 126 MB/s +2%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
382 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+21%
315 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
48.6 MB/s Slightly faster peak random mixed IO.
+7%
45.3 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
454 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+39%
327 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 9,080,616 SSDs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.2 % 0.33 % Much higher market share.
+65%
Value
Value For Money
72.8 % +1% 71.8 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
66 % +3% 64 %
Price
Price (score)
$134 $116 Slightly cheaper.
+13%
Age
Newest
45 Months Slightly more recent.
+13%
52 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
378 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue read.
+40%
270 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
359 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue write.
+15%
313 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,233 Pts Stronger server IO.
+23%
1,002 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
257 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+41%
182 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
305 MB/s Much faster deep queue read.
+74%
175 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
298 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue write.
+10%
270 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
210 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+57%
134 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
250GB 256GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The 250GB Crucial MX200 is successor to the hugely successful MX100. Both drives use the same NAND and controller but the new MX200 features Dynamic Write Acceleration (DWA) which is a new dynamically sized SLC cache. Samsung were the first to introduce SLC caching on the 840 Evo nearly two years ago so Crucial are somewhat late to the party. SLC caches generally only help performance in corner case real word scenarios and benchmarks. I prefer drives without SLC caches because they offer more consistent and sustainable real world IO. Comparing the MX100 and MX200 shows that the newer MX200 has a significantly faster peak write speed which is of course explained by the new DWA cache. Price is the deciding factor between the MX100 and MX200 so although the MX200 isn't priced aggressively yet, it will almost certainly move up the value rankings when retailers build stocks and subsequently cut prices. [Feb '15 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The Crucial MX100 is the first 16nm SSD to date. Aside from NAND, the MX100 shares the same hardware as its more expensive sibling, the M550. Comparing the MX100 and M550 shows that the two drives have similar read speeds but that the MX100 lags by nearly 50% at writing. The newer 16nm NAND reduces costs and accordingly the MX100 is the cheapest SSD (per GB) to date. In terms of performance the MX100 is a compromise which may or may not be worth making depending on individual circumstances. For typical desktop use including email, office documents and web browsing the MX100 is a great choice but power users should look elsewhere. Comparing the 250GB 840 EVO and 256GB MX100 shows that for a marginal premium, the Evo offers better write speeds. (Note: at 500GB they are more evenly matched) [Jun '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2018 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback