Today's hottest deals
OCZARC100-25SAT3-240G
$120
CrucialCT250MX200SSD1
$134
 $120 

Controller: Indilinx Barefoot 3. Flash Memory: Toshiba A19nm MLC. Release date: Q3 2014.

 $134 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2015.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 38,163 user samples
11,799 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% 139GB free
Worst Bench: 65% 82GB free
Poor: 65% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 378th / 1080
26,364 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% 110GB free
Worst Bench: 69% 211GB free
Poor: 69% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 288th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
87 % 94.8 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
363 MB/s 426 MB/s Faster read speed.
+17%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
398 MB/s 411 MB/s +3%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
23.3 MB/s 28 MB/s Faster random read.
+20%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
87.4 MB/s +1% 86.7 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
301 MB/s 342 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+14%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
33.2 MB/s 39.3 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+18%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
354 MB/s +2% 346 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
410 MB/s 470 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+15%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
426 MB/s 470 MB/s Faster peak write speed.
+10%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
27.3 MB/s 32.6 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+19%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
121 MB/s +1% 120 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
323 MB/s 382 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+18%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
39 MB/s 47.7 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+22%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
410 MB/s 458 MB/s Faster peak sustained write speed.
+12%
Market Share
Based on 77,585,568 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.01 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
9.51 % 9.84 % +3%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 55 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$120 Cheaper.
+10%
$134
Age
Newest
123 Months 118 Months +4%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
317 MB/s 378 MB/s Faster peak deep queue read.
+19%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
352 MB/s 364 MB/s +3%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,108 Pts 1,234 Pts Stronger server IO.
+11%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
258 MB/s 258 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
277 MB/s 323 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+17%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
294 MB/s 297 MB/s +1%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
226 MB/s +2% 222 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 250GB

The 240GB OCZ ARC has a solid performance profile with particularly strong 4K speeds. The ARC is positioned below both OCZ's enthusiast Vector 150 and the mainstream Vertex 460 but based on hardware specs there is very little separating the drives (newer NAND on the ARC). Comparing the Vertex 460 and ARC shows that the ARC lags particularly in terms of sequential write speed but the overall difference in effective speed is marginal. The broad performance equivalence coupled with the fact that the Vertex 460 is available at the same price point makes the 240GB ARC somewhat redundant for the time being. Given that the ARC is relatively new, prices are likely to drop significantly over the coming months at which point the ARC may make more sense. [Sep '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 250GB Crucial MX200 is successor to the hugely successful MX100. Both drives use the same NAND and controller but the new MX200 features Dynamic Write Acceleration (DWA) which is a new dynamically sized SLC cache. Samsung were the first to introduce SLC caching on the 840 Evo nearly two years ago so Crucial are somewhat late to the party. SLC caches generally only help performance in corner case real word scenarios and benchmarks. I prefer drives without SLC caches because they offer more consistent and sustainable real world IO. Comparing the MX100 and MX200 shows that the newer MX200 has a significantly faster peak write speed which is of course explained by the new DWA cache. Price is the deciding factor between the MX100 and MX200 so although the MX200 isn't priced aggressively yet, it will almost certainly move up the value rankings when retailers build stocks and subsequently cut prices. [Feb '15 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $78
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback