Today's hottest deals
OCZVTR150-25SAT3-240G
$246
OCZARC100-25SAT3-240G
$120
 $246 

Controller: OCZ Barefoot 3 M00. Flash: Toshiba 19nm (1st gen) MLC NAND. Release date: Q4 2013.

 $120 

Controller: Indilinx Barefoot 3. Flash Memory: Toshiba A19nm MLC. Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 13,406 user samples
1,607 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% 172GB free
Worst Bench: 60% 65GB free
Poor: 60% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 353rd / 1080
11,799 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% 139GB free
Worst Bench: 65% 82GB free
Poor: 65% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 378th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
89 % +2% 87 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
433 MB/s Faster read speed.
+19%
363 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
414 MB/s +4% 398 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
21.7 MB/s 23.3 MB/s Slightly faster random read.
+7%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
81.6 MB/s 87.4 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
+7%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
343 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+14%
301 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
32.2 MB/s 33.2 MB/s +3%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
367 MB/s +4% 354 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
493 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+20%
410 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
487 MB/s Faster peak write speed.
+14%
426 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
26.3 MB/s 27.3 MB/s +4%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
126 MB/s +4% 121 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
392 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+21%
323 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
40.3 MB/s +3% 39 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
477 MB/s Faster peak sustained write speed.
+16%
410 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 77,569,265 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0 %
Value
Value For Money
5.68 % 9.51 % Much better value.
+67%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 53 %
Price
Price (score)
$246 $120 Much cheaper.
+51%
Age
Newest
132 Months 123 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
365 MB/s Faster peak deep queue read.
+15%
317 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
367 MB/s +4% 352 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,215 Pts Slightly stronger server IO.
+10%
1,108 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
313 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+21%
258 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
307 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+11%
277 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
285 MB/s 294 MB/s +3%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
257 MB/s Faster deep queue mixed IO.
+14%
226 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 240GB

Comparing the 150 to the original Vector is disappointing, the newer 150 actually offers marginally worse performance than its predecessor. A strange result but verified (at least partly) by figures on OCZ's own website: 100K 4K read IOPS for the Vector vs 90K 4K read IOPS for the 150. The newer 150 comes with a 5 year warranty which covers 50GB/day vs. the original Vectors 20GB/day but even this should be taken with a pinch of salt considering that the OCZ stock price is currently trading at around seven cents per share, an all time low. Despite the fact that new Vector 150 performs worse than its predecessor it's still a very competent performer and if prices drop, it has the potential to become a decent value proposition. In the meantime however there are far better deals available elsewhere.  [Dec '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 240GB OCZ ARC has a solid performance profile with particularly strong 4K speeds. The ARC is positioned below both OCZ's enthusiast Vector 150 and the mainstream Vertex 460 but based on hardware specs there is very little separating the drives (newer NAND on the ARC). Comparing the Vertex 460 and ARC shows that the ARC lags particularly in terms of sequential write speed but the overall difference in effective speed is marginal. The broad performance equivalence coupled with the fact that the Vertex 460 is available at the same price point makes the 240GB ARC somewhat redundant for the time being. Given that the ARC is relatively new, prices are likely to drop significantly over the coming months at which point the ARC may make more sense. [Sep '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback