Today's hottest deals
OCZVTX460A-25SAT3-240G
SamsungMZ-76P256BW

Controller: Indilinx Barefoot 3 M10. Flash Memory: Toshiba 19nm MLC. Release date: Q4 2014.

Controller: Samsung MJX. Memory: Samsung 64 layer MLC V-NAND. Release date: Q1 2018.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 13,651 user samples
1,086 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 108% 88GB free
Worst Bench: 68% 143GB free
Poor: 68% Great: 108%
SPEED RANK: 315th / 1080
12,565 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 131% 228GB free
Worst Bench: 78% 69GB free (System drive)
Poor: 78% Great: 131%
SPEED RANK: 228th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
92.1 % 109 % Faster effective speed.
+19%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
397 MB/s 474 MB/s Faster read speed.
+19%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
429 MB/s +2% 419 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
23.9 MB/s 37.7 MB/s Much faster random read.
+58%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
88.3 MB/s 93.3 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
+6%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
317 MB/s 398 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+26%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
33.3 MB/s 48.3 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+45%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
399 MB/s +3% 388 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
440 MB/s 515 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+17%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
486 MB/s 488 MB/s +0%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
27.9 MB/s 45.9 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+65%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
128 MB/s 128 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
349 MB/s 448 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+28%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
40 MB/s 61 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+52%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
463 MB/s 487 MB/s Slightly faster peak sustained write speed.
+5%
Market Share
Based on 77,560,273 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.02 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
7.53 % 15.5 % Hugely better value.
+106%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % +2% 52 %
Price
Price (score)
$177 $90 Much cheaper.
+49%
Age
Newest
120 Months 81 Months Much more recent.
+32%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
357 MB/s 389 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue read.
+9%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
370 MB/s +2% 361 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,206 Pts 1,289 Pts Slightly stronger server IO.
+7%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
284 MB/s 367 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+29%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
301 MB/s 343 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+14%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
297 MB/s +0% 296 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
241 MB/s 309 MB/s Faster deep queue mixed IO.
+28%
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 256GB

The OCZ Vertex 460A is basically a tweaked re-release of last years Vertex 460. The two drives share the same controller and the same basic NAND, although the 460A apparently uses a newer version of Toshiba's 19nm MLC. Unsurprisingly there is little difference in performance between the 460 and 460A. In absolute terms, with peak sequential read/write speeds of 516/500 MBps and peak 4K random read/write speeds of 25/120 MB/s the 460A does have a rock solid performance profile but OCZ cannot afford to re-release 12 month old technology, at least not of they want to continue to compete with the likes of Samsung, SanDisk and Crucial who are continuously innovating. Overall the 240GB 460A still sits amongst the top handful of drives both in terms of outright performance and value for money[Jan '15 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 860 Pro is Samsung’s latest consumer-grade SATA SSD flagship, superseding the popular, but now three years old, 850 Pro. Like the 850 Pro, the 860 Pro is based on Samsung’s proprietary and revolutionary (at the time), MLC V-NAND (3D). A 10% price premium over the 256 GB 850 Pro will purchase the 256 GB 860 Pro which has an impressive 16% faster effective speed. This is achieved via an updated controller (MJX) and 64 layers of V-NAND (versus 32 layers per the 850 Pro). The 860 Pro has sequential speeds of up to 540 MB/s which almost completely saturate its SATA 3.0 interface. These peak levels of performance are slightly higher, but still comparable to the peak performance of the 860 Evo before its SLC write cache (12 GB on the 250 GB Evo) is saturated, making the 860 Evo (at around 30% cheaper) a more economical choice for users who rarely write more than 12 GB at a time. There are also reliability improvements compared to the 850 generation with Samsung now offering a warranty of 300 TBW (terabytes written) for the 256 GB 860 Pro, compared to 150 TBW for the 256 GB 850 Pro. Thanks to higher density NAND, the 860 Pro is also available in a 4 TB variant, whereas previously 2 TB was the largest capacity for a Samsung SATA MLC SSD.  [Feb '18 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback