COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
SSD
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR SSD
ADD TO PC
BUILD
SamsungMZ-76P256BW
OCZVTX460-25SAT3-240G
$203
▲ 52216 ▼

Controller: Samsung MJX. Memory: Samsung 64 layer MLC V-NAND. Release date: Q1 2018.

VS
▲ 531,540 ▼
 $203 

Controller: Indilinx Barefoot 3 M10. Flash Memory: Toshiba 19nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2014.

Effective Speed 
+21%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 14,295 user samples
Benchmark your SSD here
12,565 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 131% 228GB free
Worst Bench: 78% 69GB free (System drive)
Poor: 78% Great: 131%
SPEED RANK: 228th / 1080
1,730 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% 160GB free
Worst Bench: 64% 75GB free (System drive)
Poor: 64% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 334th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed 		109 % Faster effective speed.
+21% 		90.3 %
Average Score 
+22%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed 		474 MB/s Faster read speed.
+12% 		422 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed 		419 MB/s 421 MB/s +0%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed 		37.7 MB/s Much faster random read.
+67% 		22.6 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed 		93.3 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
+7% 		86.9 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed 		398 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+17% 		341 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 		48.3 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+45% 		33.3 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed 		388 MB/s +4% 372 MB/s
Peak Score 
+24%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed 		515 MB/s Slightly faster peak read speed.
+9% 		474 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed 		488 MB/s +1% 482 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed 		45.9 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+76% 		26.1 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed 		128 MB/s +4% 123 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed 		448 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+17% 		384 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 		61 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+56% 		39.1 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average 		487 MB/s +4% 470 MB/s
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 77,560,474 SSDs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.02 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		15.5 % Hugely better value.
+134% 		6.65 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		52 % 53 % +2%
Price
Price (score) 		$90 Much cheaper.
+56% 		$203
Nice To Haves 
+18%
Age
Newest 		81 Months Much more recent.
+37% 		129 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed 		389 MB/s Faster peak deep queue read.
+15% 		338 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed 		361 MB/s +2% 355 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score 		1,289 Pts Stronger server IO.
+11% 		1,157 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 		367 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+31% 		281 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed 		343 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+16% 		295 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed 		296 MB/s +4% 284 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 		309 MB/s Faster deep queue mixed IO.
+28% 		241 MB/s
Specifications 
Capacity
Capacity 		256GB 240GB
Conclusion 
Average Bench 109%
Average Bench 90.3%

The 860 Pro is Samsung’s latest consumer-grade SATA SSD flagship, superseding the popular, but now three years old, 850 Pro. Like the 850 Pro, the 860 Pro is based on Samsung’s proprietary and revolutionary (at the time), MLC V-NAND (3D). A 10% price premium over the 256 GB 850 Pro will purchase the 256 GB 860 Pro which has an impressive 16% faster effective speed. This is achieved via an updated controller (MJX) and 64 layers of V-NAND (versus 32 layers per the 850 Pro). The 860 Pro has sequential speeds of up to 540 MB/s which almost completely saturate its SATA 3.0 interface. These peak levels of performance are slightly higher, but still comparable to the peak performance of the 860 Evo before its SLC write cache (12 GB on the 250 GB Evo) is saturated, making the 860 Evo (at around 30% cheaper) a more economical choice for users who rarely write more than 12 GB at a time. There are also reliability improvements compared to the 850 generation with Samsung now offering a warranty of 300 TBW (terabytes written) for the 256 GB 860 Pro, compared to 150 TBW for the 256 GB 850 Pro. Thanks to higher density NAND, the 860 Pro is also available in a 4 TB variant, whereas previously 2 TB was the largest capacity for a Samsung SATA MLC SSD.  [Feb '18 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The OCZ Vertex 460 replaces the Vertex 450. The main difference between the two is a change from Intel/Micron (IMFT) 20nm MLC NAND to Toshiba 19nm MLC NAND, a fitting move considering that Toshiba acquired OCZ shortly before the Vertex 460's release. Comparing the Vertex 460 and 450 shows that the two drives are broadly on a par in terms of performance. In terms of pricing the Vertex 460 is priced reasonably considering its age, I expect prices will drop rapidly as retailers build stocks of the relatively new drive. At current prices the 240GB Vertex 460 represents above average value for money but struggles to compete with its slightly more expensive sibling, the Vector 150. Comparing the 460 and 150 shows that Vector 150 leads in terms of effective speed by 10% but only costs 5% more than the 460. [Mar '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
12,565
1,730
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Storage Devices FAQ
What is sustained sequential write speed?
What’s the difference between SLC, MLC and TLC?
What is 3D XPoint and how fast is it?
What’s the difference between SATA, PCIe and NVMe?
What’s the difference between NAND and V-NAND?
What is sequential write speed?
What is sequential read speed?
What is incompressible data?
What is queue depth?
Solid State Drives
What is the SSD value for money rating?
What is 4K 64 thread write speed?
Can CPU power saving states (C1,C2,C3) impact SSD speed?
What is the effective SSD speed index?
How is the AS SSD write score calculated?
How is the AS SSD read score calculated?
How is the AS SSD total score calculated?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback