SamsungMZ-V6P512BW
CrucialCT250MX200SSD1
$134
 $134 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2015.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 32,421 user samples
24,962 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 348% 222GB free
Worst Bench: 181% 212GB free (System drive)
Poor: 181% Great: 348%
SPEED RANK: 9th / 959
7,459 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 112% 233GB free
Worst Bench: 64% 149GB free (System drive)
Poor: 64% Great: 112%
SPEED RANK: 168th / 959
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
286 % Hugely faster effective speed.
+202%
94.7 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
2154 MB/s Hugely faster read speed.
+402%
429 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
1548 MB/s Hugely faster write speed.
+275%
413 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
46.9 MB/s Much faster random read.
+68%
28 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
147 MB/s Much faster random write.
+63%
90 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
840 MB/s Hugely faster mixed IO speed.
+146%
341 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
65.7 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+66%
39.6 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
1383 MB/s Hugely faster sustained write speed.
+309%
338 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
2656 MB/s Hugely faster peak read speed.
+465%
470 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
1946 MB/s Hugely faster peak write speed.
+316%
468 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
54.4 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+63%
33.3 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
199 MB/s Much faster peak random write.
+62%
123 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
996 MB/s Hugely faster peak mixed IO speed.
+161%
382 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
79 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+63%
48.6 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
1888 MB/s Hugely faster peak sustained write speed.
+318%
452 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 9,124,131 SSDs tested.
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.43 % Hugely higher market share.
+139%
0.18 %
Value
Value For Money
303 % Hugely better value.
+315%
73 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
66 % 66 %
Price
Price (score)
$180 $134 Cheaper.
+26%
Age
Newest
24+ Months Much more recent.
+47%
45 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
1317 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue read.
+248%
378 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
1342 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue write.
+273%
360 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
4,183 Pts Hugely stronger server IO.
+239%
1,234 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
1140 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+344%
257 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
1048 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue read.
+242%
306 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
916 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue write.
+207%
298 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
905 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue mixed IO.
+331%
210 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
512GB 250GB
ADVERTISEMENT

Samsung’s NVMe SSD flagship, the 960 Pro, is one of the fastest consumer SSDs on the market, currently second only to Intel’s 900P Optane SSDs. This PCIe SSD offers high-end performance at a premium price and therefore, as the name suggests, is may be more suited towards professional users. Our real world benchmarks show that the 960 Pro has read/write speeds in excess of 4 times faster than the Samsung 850 Pro which is the next best SATA SSD. Compared to the now two year old NVMe 950 Pro the 960 Pro offers significantly higher write throughput and is less susceptible to thermal throttling. The 960 Pro is based on a denser version of Samsung’s V-NAND (3D) technology, featuring more layers of memory cells. The 960 Pro also features an upgraded and faster 5 ARM Polaris controller, compared to the 950 Pro’s 3 ARM UBX controller. The smallest capacity for the 960 Pro is 512 GB, which may make it prohibitively expensive for some. Fortunately, for those that still want the superb NVMe performance, the 250 GB Samsung 960 Evo offers a more affordable choice, albeit with lower sustained write speeds when compared to the 512 GB 960 Pro. The 960 Pro is based on MLC (2-bit) V-NAND whilst the 960 Evo is based on the slightly lower enduring TLC (3-bit) V-NAND, and this accounts for Samsung’s reduced warranty for the 960 Evo (3 years/200 TBW versus 5 years/400 TBW for the 512 GB versions of the 960 Evo and 960 Pro respectively). Unlike the 960 Evo, the 960 Pro doesn’t have an SLC cache which results in more consistent sustained write speeds. [Nov '17 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 250GB Crucial MX200 is successor to the hugely successful MX100. Both drives use the same NAND and controller but the new MX200 features Dynamic Write Acceleration (DWA) which is a new dynamically sized SLC cache. Samsung were the first to introduce SLC caching on the 840 Evo nearly two years ago so Crucial are somewhat late to the party. SLC caches generally only help performance in corner case real word scenarios and benchmarks. I prefer drives without SLC caches because they offer more consistent and sustainable real world IO. Comparing the MX100 and MX200 shows that the newer MX200 has a significantly faster peak write speed which is of course explained by the new DWA cache. Price is the deciding factor between the MX100 and MX200 so although the MX200 isn't priced aggressively yet, it will almost certainly move up the value rankings when retailers build stocks and subsequently cut prices. [Feb '15 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) October 2018 SSD Rankings.

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback