COMPARE
SSD
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR SSD
ADD TO PC
BUILD
SeagateST240HM000
$215
KingstonSH103S3/240G
▲ 531,416 ▼
 $215 

Controller: LAMD LM87800. Flash Memory: Toshiba 19nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2013.

VS
▲ 532,729 ▼

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281VB1-SDC. NAND Memory: Intel Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2012.

Effective Speed 
+2%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 31,090 user samples
Benchmark your SSD here
3,595 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 103% 41GB free
Worst Bench: 56% 22GB free (System drive)
Poor: 56% Great: 103%
SPEED RANK: 448th / 1074
27,495 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 94% 1TB free
Worst Bench: 59% 25GB free (System drive)
Poor: 59% Great: 94%
SPEED RANK: 479th / 1074
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed 		82.5 % +2% 80.6 %
Average Score 
+9%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed 		422 MB/s Faster read speed.
+13% 		375 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed 		377 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+55% 		243 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed 		23.4 MB/s 31.2 MB/s Much faster random read.
+33%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed 		69.8 MB/s 82.3 MB/s Faster random write.
+18%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed 		309 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+13% 		274 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 		31.1 MB/s 40.2 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+29%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed 		302 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+65% 		183 MB/s
Peak Score 
+15%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed 		496 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+12% 		442 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed 		450 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+60% 		281 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed 		28.3 MB/s 37.8 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+34%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed 		98.9 MB/s 112 MB/s Faster peak random write.
+13%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed 		348 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+12% 		312 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 		37.9 MB/s 49.6 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+31%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average 		439 MB/s Hugely faster peak sustained write speed.
+99% 		221 MB/s
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 76,113,805 SSDs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0 % 0.02 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money 		5.82 % 13.2 % Hugely better value.
+127%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		53 % 53 %
Price
Price (score) 		$215 $70 Much cheaper.
+67%
Nice To Haves 
+14%
Age
Newest 		133 Months Slightly more recent.
+9% 		146 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed 		361 MB/s Faster peak deep queue read.
+21% 		298 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed 		352 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue write.
+33% 		264 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score 		1,166 Pts Stronger server IO.
+18% 		985 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 		256 MB/s 289 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+13%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed 		301 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+17% 		258 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed 		265 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+27% 		209 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 		220 MB/s 223 MB/s +1%
Specifications 
Capacity
Capacity 		240GB 240GB
Conclusion 
Average Bench 82.5%
Average Bench 80.6%
ADVERTISEMENT

This is Seagate's third foray into the the SSD market and it's clear from the specifications that Seagate haven't taken any chances. The 600 incorporates the now reasonably established LAMD LM87800 controller coupled with 19 NM Toshiba MLC, a very similar combination to Corsair's Neutron GTX. This combination of hardware coupled with Seagate's custom firmware produces a very solid set of performance figures. With a Real World Performance rating of 531 MB/s and an AS SSD total score of 1131 the Seagate 600 demonstrates both superb server and consumer performance capabilities. The pricing on the 600 is currently around average for a group leading SSD and likely to drop with time as the 600 is still relatively recent. Overall the 240GB Seagate 600 represents good value for money and delivers great performance. [Aug '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The HyperX 3K is an updated version of the regular HyperX, the only difference between the two SSDs is the grade of NAND flash. The regular HyperX's NAND flash is rated at 5,000 erase cycles vs 3,000 on the 3K version so broadly speaking the number of erase cycles before drive failure on the newer drive is approximately 40% less than on the original HyperX. The distinction is largely irrelevant for consumer users because even after 10 years neither of the drives are likely to come even close to their maximum number of erase cycles. As expected both HyperX's have very similar performance profiles which can be seen in this direct comparison of the two drives. Although the HyperX SSDs were strong contenders on release they are showing their age now and can no longer compete amongst the newer drives from Samsung and Plextor which are both cheaper and faster. [Jan '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
3,595
27,495
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Storage Devices FAQ
What is sustained sequential write speed?
What’s the difference between SLC, MLC and TLC?
What is 3D XPoint and how fast is it?
What’s the difference between SATA, PCIe and NVMe?
What’s the difference between NAND and V-NAND?
What is sequential write speed?
What is sequential read speed?
What is incompressible data?
What is queue depth?
Solid State Drives
What is the SSD value for money rating?
What is 4K 64 thread write speed?
Can CPU power saving states (C1,C2,C3) impact SSD speed?
What is the effective SSD speed index?
How is the AS SSD write score calculated?
How is the AS SSD read score calculated?
How is the AS SSD total score calculated?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback