Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive8.02% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P6T SE  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 21:11
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$145
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 96.3
1-Core 96.6
2-Core 193
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 490
54% 424 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 85D7) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 26.3
Parallax 32.3
30% 31.7 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 34.2
Splatting 33.3
28% 35 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung RBX Series 64GB M
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VAM05D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 9.2 6.2 22 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Read 18
Write 34.2
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 16.3
4% 19.8 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
24% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 21%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 97 98 95 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 93.8
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 96.7
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 22.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 15.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 52.9
76% 52.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T SE Builds (Compare 1,483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P6T SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback