Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 76.1 1-Core 78 2-Core 155 61% 103 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 456 47% 378 Pts	64-Core 452 28% 452 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800 3,739 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.00 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	6.24% Terrible	Lighting 8.7 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 4.5 7% 7.5 fps	MRender 7.8 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 3 5% 6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.24% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30 4,522 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0704A1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 383 386 384 382 377 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Read 498 Write 376 Mixed 404 SusWrite 373 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 89.5 4K Mixed 30.4 139% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 48.7 84% 162 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 95%
Samsung RBX Series 64GB M 159 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 52GB free Firmware: VAM05D1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 75 77 77 75 77 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 93.8 Write 65.8 Mixed 61.1 SusWrite 67.6 16% 72.1 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 9.2 43% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMY8GX3M2B2133C11 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMY8GX3M2B2133C9 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.1% Average	MC Read 16.6 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 12.7 30% 10.4 GB/s	Latency 88.1 45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610