Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '20 at 02:03
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 184
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 538
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 68
Reflection 68
Parallax 93
55% 76.3 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 57.2
53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 120GB-$30
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0704A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 378 381 384 382 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 379
Mixed 404
SusWrite 376
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 30.4
138% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 46.4
76% 144 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 95%
USB Disk 8GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 4 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Read 11.7
Write 2
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 3.9
5% 5.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMY8GX3M2B2133C11 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CMY8GX3M2B2133C9 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.6% Below average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback