Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 4158CL9

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 4158CL9 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140114
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '18 at 14:17
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 93.3 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 162 68% 112 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 437 46% 369 Pts	64-Core 556 34% 556 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36AD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37% Below average	Lighting 48.7 Reflection 45.3 Parallax 40.3 40% 44.7 fps	MRender 39.6 Gravity 41.6 Splatting 36.5 32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 288GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 228 226 236 229 233 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	72.1% Very good	Read 243 Write 216 Mixed 202 SusWrite 229 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 39.9 126% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 194 145% 194 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 124%
WD WD3000BLFS-08YBU0 300GB 753 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 176GB free Firmware: 04.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 87 87 89 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 92.8 Write 92 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 87.5 62% 84 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 71%
Seagate ST1000DM010-2EP1 1TB 124 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 930GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 188 187 189 191 196 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 142 Mixed 89.5 SusWrite 190 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 3x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 3 of 12 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 20.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 12.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 4158CL9 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4158CL9

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	2x
Xeon X5570Intel $99Bench 69%, 1,343 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	2x
Quadro FX 4800NvidiaBench 6%, 2,114 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	1x

SSD
870 QVO 1TBSamsung $112Bench 95%, 80,665 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x
Raid VD 0 240GBMarvellBench 54%, 200 samples	1x

RAM
HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 3x4GBHynixBench 40%, 7 samples	2x
HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 3x4GBHynixBench 58%, 13 samples	1x
M393B5170EH1-CH9 12x4GBUnknownBench 52%, 23 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $112

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370