Today's hottest deals

HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '18 at 08:22
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 50.3
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 130
46% 81.8 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 445
42% 350 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
Asus(1043 83B5) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 20.3
Parallax 17.8
14% 18.5 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 17.6
Splatting 20
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 271 306 311 311 312 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 343
Write 296
Mixed 310
SusWrite 304
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 29.4
96% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 31.1
DQ Write 81.1
DQ Mixed 42.5
36% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF1G72PZ-1G9E1 4x8GB
4 of 12 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.6
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback