Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G870-$77 1,800 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 90 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 158 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 159 8-Core 159 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 3505) 1GB CLim: 730 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 5.23 Parallax 3.69 4% 4.47 fps	MRender 6.19 Gravity 4.47 Splatting 3.22 4% 4.62 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CHN 25SATAA3 480 480GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 355GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0314B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 392 402 408 414 417 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Read 453 Write 404 Mixed 334 SusWrite 391 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 87.5 4K Mixed 18.9 104% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 21.2 70% 144 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 82%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 37GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 84 84 84 87 93 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 95.2 Write 90.5 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 85.1 60% 82.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	50x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	43x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	35x

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $195